Loading ...

Moral injury, moral resilience, and the consequences of expectation | Coaching Children (Ages 5-12) | ConnectedCoaches

ConnectedCoaches uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to the use of the cookies. For more details about cookies how we manage them and how you can delete them see the 'Use of cookies' part of our privacy policy. Click the cross to close this cookie notice. X

Home » Groups » Coaching Children (Ages 5-12) » blogs » Andrew Beaven » Moral injury, moral resilience, and the consequences of expectation
Coaching Children (Ages 5-12)

Leave group:

Are you sure you want to leave this space?

Join this group:

Join this space?

Add a new tab

Add a hyperlink to the space navigation. You can link to internal or external web pages. Enter the Tab name and Tab URL. Upload or choose an icon. Then click Save.

The name that will appear in the space navigation.
The url can point to an internal or external web page.
Login to follow, share, and participate in this group.
Not a member?Join now

Moral injury, moral resilience, and the consequences of expectation

Avg: 0 / 5 (0votes)

There have been several recent allegations of abusive coaching behaviours in British Olympic and Paralympic sports.

Not in any way to condone what has been reported recently, but I find it difficult to believe the coaches involved are (or started out as) the bullies and abusers they are now revealed (alleged) to be. Or, indeed, that any coach went into sports with the prior intention of doping his provide his athletes.

So what might have happened to the coaches?

Moral injury

I came across the term on an online course (highly recommended) on providing Psychological First Aid — COVID-19: Psychological First Aid, futurelearn.com.

Moral injury is a concept first described in the military, where it was defined as psychological distress resulting from actions (or the lack of them) which violate someone’s moral or ethical code. Following orders, in some instances. In healthcare professionals, the term has been used to refer to the accumulation of negative effects by continued exposure to morally distressing situations — the example of healthcare staff working with inadequate PPE, or hospitals compelled to discharge elderly patients to care homes without first checking their COVID-19 status.

The accumulated moral injury will surely have a negative impact on mental health and well-being.

And just as surely, moral standards can erode under pressure.

Moral injury and coaches?

I do wonder about the psychological impact on “elite” coaches driven to achieve medal success irrespective of the injury, physical and psychological, caused to the young athletes in their charge.

Even coaching at the participation level, I have experienced (albeit at a very low level) “moral distress” at work, but never had a name for it. Generally, in the form of a commercial imperative that overrides best practice or even duty-of-care — doing the wrong thing because it is what is expected, or demanded by management.

“Yes, the kids might enjoy it more if we had fewer of them on the summer camp and they each had more time with the coaches, but we can make more profit if we increase the numbers to cram in as many as we can."

And how much greater must be the cumulative moral injury to the coach driven by a national imperative to win Gold.

A question for the Coach Developers

How do we empower coaches (all coaches, not just in performance environments) to stick to what they know is right?

Do we need to include ethics alongside safeguarding in coach education programmes?

Yes, it is about “doing the right thing” and “being good”, but I’m not sure that can be taught in Coach Dev — sometimes “it’s wrong because it’s wrong” should be all the argument needed.

But Coach Dev perhaps also needs to be about providing perspective, giving coaches the time and space (and the tools) to reflect on what they are doing, on what they want to do and how they want to coach.

Perhaps by allowing the coach to redefine their own success?

Perhaps NGBs and funders need to support the development of moral resilience in their coaches (see “Cultivating Moral Resilience”, by Cynda Hylton Rushton) — the ability to respond positively (or, at least, less negatively) to repeated moral distress?

But coaches also need to know that they won’t see contracts terminated because they aren’t willing to push their charges just that little bit harder, to prove that they (the coaches) really want that success.

So difficult, when “success” = medals.

Login to follow, share, comment and participate. Not a member? Join for free now.

Comments (2)


One possible answer — for coaches to take the initiative.
“Just as we aim to create development environments for our players, we must coach up and demand that the people in charge of our clubs and governing bodies do the same for us – if they don’t, we must be brave enough to walk away with our integrity intact.”

from 2015: Coaching: Is it Art or Science? playerdevelopmentproject.com/coaching-is-it/ via @PlayerDP

Avg: 0 / 5 (0votes)

Moral injury — not interesting enough?

I have been disappointed (if not not entirely surprised) by the lack of response to this article.
It has been viewed* nearly 300 times since it was published two months ago (as of 26/10/20), but has provoked not one comment, on here or on twitter. A couple of retweets. But that’s all.

I had thought that the topic was relevant, and the “moral injury” angle was new (to me, at least).

Aside from celebration and/or denigration of managers in professional sports in the sports pages, and the near-deification of “fitness” and “activity” coaches (especially) during lockdown, almost the only coverage of “coaches” seen in the mainstream media is around reports of athlete abuse, whether it be physical, sexual, psychological.
As a community, this is how we are most often presented to the outside world.
But no-one on here has been moved to comment.

Maybe the article was poorly written. I do tend to write primarily for myself, to work through my own thoughts on a subject.
Maybe no-one made it as far as the end?

Maybe coaches and coach developers feel that this doesn’t apply to them? “Not in my sport”. “Not in my club”.
Or, conversely, that they feel that are too close to people and institutions implicated by recent allegations?

But to have elicited not a single comment?

* can’t tell how many times the piece has actually been read of course — the “views” might mostly be “fat finger” clicks on a link in a tweet, with little or no actual engagement with the text.

Avg: 0 / 5 (0votes)