Loading ...

Effective Communication for Coaches | Welcome and General | ConnectedCoaches

ConnectedCoaches uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to the use of the cookies. For more details about cookies how we manage them and how you can delete them see the 'Use of cookies' part of our privacy policy. Click the cross to close this cookie notice. X

Home » Groups » Welcome and General » blogs » Alexis Lebedew » Effective Communication for Coaches
Welcome and General

Leave group:

Are you sure you want to leave this space?

Join this group:

Join this space?

Add a new tab

Add a hyperlink to the space navigation. You can link to internal or external web pages. Enter the Tab name and Tab URL. Upload or choose an icon. Then click Save.

The name that will appear in the space navigation.
The url can point to an internal or external web page.
Login to follow, share, and participate in this group.
Not a member?Join now

Effective Communication for Coaches

Avg: 4.33 / 5 (1votes)

I recently attended a great presentation by a skill acquisition specialist focussing on effective communication for coaches.

The great part of it was that all the presented did is present research findings. It wasn't his opinion, it was information based on research.

The research findings (and I'll paraphrase) were:

  • Guided Discovery has a Moderate rate of change, but changes are permanent and resistant to pressure. Direct Instruction has has a Fast rate of change but are impermanent and not resistant to pressure
    • So.....allow the athletes to make errors and work things out for themselves
  • Of three different methods of feedback (Corrective only, Positive only, Positive then Corrective) the least effective is Corrective only. Yep - just saying nice things is more effective than just giving corrective feedback. The most effective is Positive then Corrective
    • So.....if nothing else, say something positive first
  • Adapted Practice (open training drills) doesn't show improvements as quickly as Blocked Practice, but demonstrates significantly higher long term retention
    • So.....create an open environment where athletes can make errors and they will have better long term learning
  • Less feedback is actually better for long term retention of changes
    • So.....allow the athletes to make errors and work things out for themselves
  • When athletes ask for feedback they are more likely to incorporate it into their understanding, and they retain any learning
    • So.....allow the athletes to make errors and work things out for themselves
  • Coaches say approximately twice as much as they think they do, during training
    • So........!
The key outcome for me was:
  • Reflection = Retention
    • if we allow space for athletes to reflect, they retain what they learn better than just doing what they are told for a short period of time
We all coach differently, have different styles and different philosophies. But, what is presented above isn't a philosophy, its science.

If you enjoyed this you can find all my other ConnectedCoaches blogs here.

Login to follow, share, comment and participate. Not a member? Join for free now.

Comments (1)


All good stuff here Alexis. A lot of our rugby coach education involves letting the players be creative, reflect on how it went, and learn from it. We make plans and guide the sessions, but the kids really Coach their own improvements and dictate the final session path. I've been using this approach for 4 seasons now (since getting my Level 1 coaching license - funnily enough!) and it's we've seen the squad leap forwards and outperform older age groups.

Loving 'Reflection = Retention"

Avg: 0 / 5 (0votes)